Do We Need Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Biopsy for Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System Category 3 Lesions on Ultrasound?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 2 ISSUE: 2
P: 22 - 26
August 2023

Do We Need Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Biopsy for Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System Category 3 Lesions on Ultrasound?

Curr Res MRI 2023;2(2):22-26
1. Department of Radiology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey
2. Department of Radiology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey
3. Department of Anatomy, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Accepted Date: 29.08.2023
Online Date: 29.08.2023
Publish Date: 29.08.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 was established for lesions that were thought to be probably benign, and its aim was to limit the number of biopsies performed. Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesions are common, but they remain controversial due to high interob- server variability. Our aim is to examine how many cases with a sonographically identified Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesion were performed on breast magnetic resonance imaging and/or biopsy and whether the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category changes with the breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods: This retrospective study included 498 patients who underwent breast ultrasonography between November 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, and who had Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesion(s). Among these patients, those who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging and/or biopsy within 3 months were found. Magnetic resonance images were evaluated for sonographically identified Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesion(s). Tru-cut biopsy results were also evaluated.

Results: Of 498 patients who had Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesion(s) on ultrasonography, 66 (13.3%) underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging subsequently. With the magnetic resonance imaging, there were 17 patients (25.7%) whose Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System cat- egory downgraded, 12 (18.1%) whose category upgraded, and 37 (56.1%) whose category remained unchanged. The mean age of those who had a biopsy was found to be lower than those who did not have a biopsy (P = .028).

Conclusion: The aim of Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 was to limit the number of breast biopsies performed. Magnetic resonance imag- ing can be used as a problem solver for Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesions and can also update the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category. Biopsy of Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System category 3 lesions may not be cost effective due to the low probability of malignancy.

Cite this article as: Öztürk MÖ, Bilici E, Kösetürk T, Çetin T. Do we need breast MRI or biopsy for BIRADS 3 lesions on ultrasound? Current Research in MRI, 2023;2(2):22-26.

Keywords:
BIRADS 3, breast US, breast MRI